Hacker RealtimeBuilt with Neon Realtime
connecting… · checking source…

Comment on Hacker News

  1. Benchmark scores recolored for readability:

    https://i.imgur.com/IDFGuJU.jpeg

    reply
  2. Of course the naming is confusing. With way OAI & Ant are naming models, I assumed that this would be a tier above Argon, but it's the same price?
    reply
  3. Where is 4 flash?

    3.8 flash is a really solid "everyday" model. Was hoping a new flash model would be the next release.

    reply
  4. > Building on Gemini 4 Argon, which was launched two weeks ago, Carbon illustrates the pace at which we’re pushing the frontier forward. Our researchers and models are working hand in hand to advance capabilities faster, while strengthening our safeguards in tandem.

    Is it a variant of Argon? A different model? The next version? It seems like this is a separate class (like Anthropic's Mythos).

    anyway, its needlessly confusing.

    reply
  5. 75% chance OAI or Anthropic take the crown back within a week?
    reply
  6. Just remembered i haven't tried argon yet, they announced argon then and delayed releasing it, didn't even know they've made it publically available. I don't understand why google thinks this is an awesome strategy in a market where there are other really good models.
    reply
  7. Perhaps someone should tell the Gemini team about these models. When I open gemini.google.com I see 3.6 Flash and 3.1 Pro.
    reply
  8. Does anyone know what the naming convention is here? Does this supersede Argon? They have the same pricing, $4/$20 normally and $1/$10 'promotional'.
    reply
  9. > Gemini 4 Carbon will launch at the same introductory price 1 as Argon at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens, with cached input tokens priced at 95% off input token price.

    So more capable and same price? I can at least appreciate that

    reply
  10. So, AA published an updated score yesterday, and a new Google model ranks on top of that updated index today.

    What a coincidence it is!

    reply
  11. > Reducing shortcuts and loophole exploitation: With Carbon, we further mitigated shortcut attempts in training while ensuring high-quality coding performance. Carbon reduced successful cheating on Terminal-Bench 4.0 to 0.0%, with attempts to cheat dropping to 0.4% — all while improving overall accuracy.

    This is probably the single most important thing to make frontier models usable right now, so I'm happy there seems to be some progress. This was the previous Gemini's biggest problem IMO

    reply
  12. Is this the first time VendingBench was used as a serious benchmark result in a model release? That's kinda funny.
    reply
  13. While there are a hundred different evals it seems to me that we've settled on crowning the #1 coding model as the best model. So in those terms this is still behind Opus 5.5 and Astra.
    reply
  14. Wow, $2/$10 for input and output even if just for introductory pricing is an incredible deal. Wonder how token efficient it is.
    reply
  15. What makes me most excited is that we probably get fable 5.5 soon with the IPO. Which is going to surpass this again. But cool to see progress!
    reply
  16. tbh i might be one of the few who actually likes gemini since 3. it wasnt as good at coding compared to other two but it always wrote the best, and talked the best, providing very good conversation experience. it works incredibly well in my customer service agent harness and my users have been very satisfied. Now Gemini 4 is incredible, but the same old issue: a powerful model, in the worst official harness

    deepmind should get rid of those antigravity ppl they're a joke and sabotaging the model's reputation.

    reply
  17. Just cancelled my Anthropic subscription. Looking forward to this.
    reply
  18. 'Coming soon'. 2027 perhaps?
    reply
  19. Google really tried to make it sound like they're not in the AI race, but suddenly are pushing out huge challengers in the space. I originally took them to be fully focused on the consumer side, but it looks like they're going after it all, now.
    reply
  20. [deleted]